Lecture Two
National Income and Product Accounts
(Economics 100b; Spring 1996)
Brad DeLong
Associate Professor of Economics, 601 Evans
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720
(510) 643-4027 phone (510) 642-6615 fax
delong@econ.berkeley.edu
http://www.j-bradford-delong.net
January 22, 1996
Inflation (a topic left over from last Friday's lecture)
Circular Flow
Rules for Computing GDP
Anomalies and Imputations
Components of Expenditure
Related Measures
Real and Nominal GDP
The problem set associated with this week's lectures is going to be
called Macroeconomic
Measurement
Circular Flow
Let's begin with GDP--gross domestic product, with all the
explication we did last time...
GDP is, at the same time:
- The total income of everyone in the economy
- The total expenditure on final goods and services in
the economy
- The total value added in the (marketed sectors of) the
economy

How can it be all these three things at once? Because we define them
that way, so that the only difference between total economy-wide
incomeand total expenditure is the "statistical
discrepancy".
Three parts of the "circular flow" diagram:
- Income (salaries, interest, profit, rent; received by factors
of production in exchange for the provision of labor, capital,
entrepreneurship and risk, and land)
- But everyone's income is someone else's Expenditure (what if
you hoard--try to hide your income under the mattress; but someone
else had that cash beforehand, and is thus dishoarding)
- And everyone's expenditure is for some purpose--in exchange
for some Value Added
Windfall gains and losses on asset prices; increases in the value
of your house; the "wealth" created by Netscape's IPO do not enter
into this circular flow set of definitions at all.
Why make the definitions this way? So you can measure things a number
of different ways. You can use accounting identities to check that
things add up.
Rules for Computing GDP
"Investment" in inventories...
"Intermediate" goods and value added; take only value-added in
each stage of production; not the total amount of sales.
- Digression on the Spanish alcabala...
Anomalies and Imputations
- The peculiar treatment of owner-occupied housing
- The peculiar treatment of government (no productivity growth:
value of government output is the value of the factors of
production used)
- GDP calculated quarterly; frequently revised
substantially...
Conclusion: GDP is a most imperfect measure of economic activity, but
its imperfections do not change much from quarter-to-quarter or
year-to-year.
Components of Expenditure
- Consumption (services; non-durables; durable
consumption)(roughly 40%; 20%; 8% of GDP)
- Investment (depreciation; net residential investment;
net non-residential investment; inventory
investment)(roughly 9%; 2%; 5%; 1% of GDP)
- Government purchases of goods and services (roughly 17%
of GDP)
- Net Exports (-2% of GDP these days)
Economists' peculiar definition of "investment": does not
include capital gains (or losses) on property already existing.
Focuses on tangible property.
- Consider when Ford Motor Company "invented" the assembly line,
and spent a lot of time and resources getting it to run smoothly.
That kind of "investment" does not show up in the GDP acounts.
Related Measures of Output and Income
- Gross Domestic Product vs. Gross National
Product
- Gross Domestic Product vs. Net Domestic Product
- National Income = Net National Product Minus Indirect Business
Taxes
- Personal Income = NI - (profits - dividends) + government
transfers + (personal interest - net interest) - social insurance
contributions
Some numbers relating measures of output and income:
- GDP almost identical to GNP (which is odd, given that the U.S.
"owes" roughly a trillion dollars to the rest of the world)
- NNP is some 89% of GNP
- National Income is some 83% of GNP
Out of National Income:
- Wages and salaries (plus benefits and employer-provided social
insurance contributions) are 75%
- Proprietors' incomes are roughly 8%
- Net rent is maybe 0.5%
- Corporate profits are 9%
- Net interest is the rest (perhaps 8%)
Real and Nominal GDP
We choose a base year for measuring real GDP
A price index with a fixed basket of goods: a "Laspeyres"
index
A price index dual to a fixed-prices quantities index: a
"Paasche" index
A "Laspeyres" index takes no account of people's ability to
substitute to achieve the same utility when commodities become more
expensive...
A "Paasche" price index (like the GDP implicit price deflator) does
not take account of the utility lost as changing prices push you away
from your original basket of consumption choices.
- For years closer to the present than the base year, real GDP
tends to overstate rates of economic growth.
- For yeas further in the past than the base year, real GDP
tends to understate rates of economic growth.