BASIC MACROECONOMIC DATA: BILLIONS OF CHAINED 1996 DOLLARS AT ANNUAL RATES
Business Change Net Unem- Federal
Fixed in Exports Gvt. Natl. ploy- Capacity Funds
Period Real GDP Consumption Investment Inventories Purchases Defense Inflation ment Utiliz. Rate
------ ------- ------- ------- ----- ------ ------- ----- --- --- ---- ---
1998:I 8,396.3 5,576.3 1,099.5 113.1 -180.8 1,456.1 332.0 1.1 4.6 5.5
II 8,442.9 5,660.2 1,132.3 42.0 -223.1 1,482.6 342.0 1.0 4.4 5.5
III 8,528.5 5,713.7 1,136.6 71.8 -241.2 1,489.9 346.5 1.4 4.5 5.5
IV 8,667.9 5,784.7 1,175.4 80.0 -239.2 1,504.8 345.8 1.1 4.4 4.9
1999:I 8,733.5 5,854.0 1,192.6 83.4 -283.0 1,512.3 342.7 1.8 4.3 81.0 4.7
II 8,771.2 5,936.1 1,214.9 32.7 -313.4 1,516.8 339.7 1.3 4.3 81.0 4.7
III 8,871.5 6,000.0 1,244.6 39.6 -333.3 1,533.2 350.0 1.4 4.2 81.3 5.1
IV 9,049.9 6,083.6 1,262.4 92.7 -337.8 1,564.8 361.9 1.6 4.1 81.6 5.3
2000:I 9,102.5 6,171.7 1,309.4 28.9 -371.1 1,560.4 342.3 3.9 4.1 82.0 5.7
II 9,229.4 6,226.3 1,347.7 78.9 -392.8 1,577.2 354.8 2.2 3.9 82.6 6.3
III 9,260.1 6,292.1 1,371.1 51.7 -411.2 1,570.0 345.1 1.8 4.0 82.4 6.5
IV 9,303.9 6,341.1 1,374.5 42.8 -421.1 1,582.8 353.8 1.9 4.0 81.3 6.5
2001:I 9,334.5 6,388.5 1,373.9 -27.1 -404.5 1,603.4 360.3 3.3 4.2 79.2 5.6
II 9,338.4 6,427.5 1,320.6 -38.4 -410.5 1,624.5 362.3 2.2 4.5 77.9 4.3
III 4.9* 76.2* 3.0*
*Estimate
|
|
If this were to happen--and if interest rates were to remain the same--the fall in investment spending would feed through into the multiplier process. It would reduce consumption spending as well. The fall in investment would trigger an amplified reduction in the equilibrium level of aggregate demand for each possible value of the interest rate.
The Federal Reserve's shift in policy was successful. As baseline investment spending was slowed in early 1999 by the financial disturbances of late 1998, real GDP growth slowed to a rate of 2.4 percent per year in the first half of 1999. But then, as the effects of the interest rate increases at the end of 1998 made themselves felt in the economy, investment picked up and real GDP growth accelerated to 6.5 percent per year in the second half of 1999. By the end of 1999 the Federal Reserve was no longer worried about falling investment, rising unemployment, and recession. Instead, it was worried about a stock market boom causing overexuberance, possible rises in business plans for baseline invstment spending, upward pressure on aggregate demand, and rises in capacity utilization and falls in unemployment to points at which rapidly accelerating inflation would become inescapable... |